dowidth.com 
Proximity bias occurs when managers favor employees who are physically closer, leading to skewed evaluations and missed opportunities for remote or distant team members. Centrality bias reflects the tendency to focus on central or prominent employees in an organizational network, often overlooking peripheral contributors with valuable insights. Explore the impact of these biases on leadership effectiveness and team dynamics to enhance fair management practices.
Why it is important
Understanding the difference between Proximity bias and Centrality bias is crucial for effective management as it helps leaders recognize and mitigate unconscious preferences that affect decision-making and team dynamics. Proximity bias refers to favoring employees who are physically closer, while Centrality bias involves prioritizing those in strategic or central roles regardless of actual performance. Recognizing these biases improves fairness in evaluations, resource allocation, and promotes a more inclusive organizational culture. Correctly addressing these biases drives better productivity, employee satisfaction, and objective leadership.
Comparison Table
| Aspect | Proximity Bias | Centrality Bias |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Preference for employees physically closer to the manager. | Preference for employees with central organizational positions. |
| Focus | Physical closeness and visibility. | Network positioning and influence within the organization. |
| Impact on Management | Can lead to unfair evaluations based on location. | May cause favoritism toward well-connected employees. |
| Common in | In-person and hybrid work environments. | Large, complex organizations with formal hierarchies. |
| Challenge | Limits diversity and remote employee engagement. | Overlooks decentralized or less visible contributors. |
| Mitigation | Emphasize objective performance metrics and remote communication. | Encourage cross-department collaboration and transparent criteria. |
Which is better?
Centrality bias often provides a broader perspective in management by prioritizing inputs from central figures or hubs within an organization, enhancing decision-making efficiency and communication flow. Proximity bias, which favors information from physically closer or more accessible team members, can limit diversity of thought and lead to overlooked insights from remote or peripheral contributors. Effective management balances these biases to ensure both accessibility and comprehensive input are considered for optimal organizational outcomes.
Connection
Proximity bias and centrality bias are interconnected cognitive tendencies influencing management decisions by favoring individuals or groups physically closer or more central within organizational networks. Both biases skew evaluations of performance and collaboration potential, as managers disproportionately reward those with easy access or high visibility. Understanding their interplay aids in developing equitable talent management and robust organizational communication strategies.
Key Terms
Decision-making
Centrality bias leads decision-makers to prioritize options perceived as more central or average, often overlooking outlier data that could be critical. Proximity bias causes preference towards options or information physically or psychologically closer to the decision-maker, potentially skewing judgment. Explore in-depth how these cognitive biases impact strategic decisions and improve decision accuracy.
Performance evaluation
Centrality bias occurs when evaluators disproportionately favor individuals who hold central positions within an organization, skewing performance assessments. Proximity bias leads to higher evaluations for employees physically closer to managers, impacting fairness in remote or hybrid work settings. Explore in-depth analysis and strategies to mitigate these biases in performance evaluations.
Workplace inclusion
Centrality bias in workplace inclusion leads to favoring individuals closely connected to core groups, while proximity bias results in preferential treatment of employees physically near decision-makers. Both biases hinder diversity by limiting exposure to varied perspectives and reinforcing homogeneous networks. Explore strategies to mitigate these biases and foster truly inclusive work environments.
Source and External Links
Types of performance review biases & how to avoid them - Centrality bias is the tendency to rate most items in the middle of a rating scale, which makes it difficult to distinguish high and low performers; it can be prevented by removing the neutral option from the scale, such as switching from a 5-point to a 4-point scale.
Types of Biases: 10 Common of Performance Review Biases - Centrality bias occurs when reviewers give middle-of-the-pack grades regardless of actual performance, often to avoid conflict or discomfort with extremes, causing high performers to be under-recognized and underperformers to miss critical feedback.
6 common biases to overcome for performance reviews - Centrality bias weakens objectivity by clustering ratings near the midpoint; removing the neutral midpoint from rating scales forces evaluators to make clearer distinctions.